|
In Canadian law, a reasonable apprehension of bias is a legal standard for disqualifying judges and administrative decision-makers for bias. Bias of the decision-maker can be real or merely perceived. The test was first stated in ''Committee for Justice and Liberty v. Canada (National Energy Board)'', : It was further developed in:〔Melo Sanchez v. Canada, 2011 FC 68〕 Further:〔R. v. Adam et al, 2006 BCSC 1540 (CANLII)〕 : Contrary evidence is addressed as follows: : It is a difficult matter to establish case law to support such a proposition. Nevertheless, consider:〔 : ==See also== * Conflict of interest * ''R. v. R.D.S.'' (1997) * ''Arsenault-Cameron v. Prince Edward Island'' (2000) 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「reasonable apprehension of bias」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|